Last Updated  on: 4th August 2026       |        Last Reviewed on: 4th August 2026

Key takeaways at a glance

  • Who is covered: every multi-state cooperative society registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, designated as a person carrying on a designated business or profession under section 2(1)(sa) of the PMLA.
  • The Trigger: A multi-state cooperative society becomes a reporting entity by virtue of its registration under the specific law and not based on any transaction or turnover threshold. Notification G.S.R. 424(E) of 4 May 2018 designated all such societies, as a reporting entity from the point of its registration under the 2002 Act.
  • Governing laws: the PMLA, 2002 and the PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005; the AML/CFT Guidelines for multi-state cooperative societies, effective 11 October 2024; the UAPA 1967 (Section 51A) and the WMD Act, 2005 (Section 12A).
  • Supervisor: the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Ministry of Cooperation. FIU-IND issues the AML/CFT Guidelines and receives the reports; the Enforcement Directorate (ED) enforces the PMLA.
  • Core duties: registration with FIU-IND on FINnet, an internal risk assessment, customer due diligence and KYC of members, beneficial owner identification, ongoing monitoring, cash and suspicious transaction reporting, five-year record keeping and sanctions screening.

This guide is general information on Indian law, not legal advice. For your society’s specific position, speak to a qualified AML professional.

Multi-state cooperative societies, also known as MSCSs, are reporting entities under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. A society registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 is a designated business regardless of the volume of its business, the earliest of the designated non-financial businesses and professions. Its AML, CFT and CPF duties flow from the PMLA, the PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, the AML/CFT Guidelines for multi-state cooperative societies, the UAPA, the WMD Act and the FIU-IND reporting framework. The Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies supervises the sector, FIU-IND issues the guidelines and receives the reports, and the Enforcement Directorate enforces the PMLA.

The core instruments at a glance

Instrument 

What it does for a society 

PMLA, 2002 

The principal legislation. Makes an MSCS a reporting entity and creates the core duties of CDD, record-keeping and reporting. 

G.S.R. 424(E), 4 May 2018 

The notification that designated multi-state cooperative societies as the DNFBP under the PMLA. 

PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 

Rulebook that provides for the procedural implementation of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. . 

AML/CFT Guidelines for MSCSs (FIU-IND) 

The society’s working guidelines, effective from 11 October 2024, applied under the Central Registrar’s circular. 

UAPA Section 51A and WMD Act Section 12A 

Impose targeted financial sanctions for terrorism and proliferation financing on every society. 

FATF Recommendations 22 and 23 

The international standards for DNFBPs that India’s cooperative designation is built to meet. 

What counts as a multi-state cooperative society in India?

A multi-state cooperative society (MSCS) is a cooperative registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, with operations extending across more than one state. These include credit and thrift societies that accept deposits and provide loans to their members, as well as other cooperatives operating on a multi-state basis. Because credit societies perform deposit-taking and lending functions similar to financial institutions, they are exposed to money laundering and terrorist financing risks.

To address these risks, Notification G.S.R. 424(E) dated 4 May 2018 designated all MSCSs as reporting entities under the PMLA. The designation is based solely on registration under the 2002 Act and does not depend on any turnover, transaction threshold, or the scale of operations. Accordingly, the obligations under the PMLA apply from the date of registration.

Are multi-state cooperative societies reporting entities under the PMLA?

Yes, MSCSs are reporting entities under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. They were the first category of designated non-financial businesses to be brought within the scope of PMLA through Notification G.S.R. 424(E) of 4 May 2018, which designated every society registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 under the residual sub-clause (vi) of section 2(1)(sa). Accordingly, such societies qualify as reporting entities under section 2(1)(wa) of the PMLA.

As reporting entities, MSCSs must register with FIU-IND on the FINnet portal and comply with the PMLA’s obligations. This places MSCSs in the same broad category of reporting entities that file with FIU-IND as banks and other designated businesses, and connects them to the wider set of DNFBPs subject to the PMLA.

Supervisory authority for multi-state cooperative societies in India

The supervisor for multi-state cooperative societies is the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, in the Ministry of Cooperation, which registers these societies and now oversees their AML compliance. The AML/CFT Guidelines effective from 11 October 2024 apply to all multi-state cooperative societies, and the Central Registrar has directed societies, by circular, to comply with the FIU-IND guidelines and to register themselves on the FINnet portal. Supervision therefore runs through the Central Registrar, while the technical AML guidance and the reporting come from FIU-IND.

A society files its reports with the Financial Intelligence Unit – India, which receives, analyses and disseminates them, while the Enforcement Directorate investigates and prosecutes the offence of money laundering under the PMLA. In short, the Central Registrar supervises the societies, FIU-IND sets the AML guidelines and takes the intelligence, and the ED enforces the criminal law.

Onboarding clients without a documented due-diligence process?

AML India can put client due diligence, beneficial-ownership checks and suspicious-transaction reporting in place for your practice, keeping you audit-ready without slowing your engagements down.

AML Regulatory Requirements for Multi-State Cooperative Societies in India

The legal framework governing multi-state cooperative societies is not contained in a single statute but is built on multiple layers of legislation. Broadly, the framework comprises the core legislation, the overarching obligations, the sectoral supervisor and its guidelines, the miscellaneous official reports, the international standards, and the allied laws.

Core Legislation

The primary framework that creates the AML, CFT and CPF obligations, grouped into three sub sectors.

AML Legislation

Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

India’s parent anti-money laundering statute and the source of a society’s reporting entity status. It defines the offence of money laundering and imposes the duties, customer due diligence under Section 11A and record-keeping under Section 12, that a multi-state cooperative society must run across its membership. The Act reaches these societies because a credit or thrift cooperative moves members’ deposits and credit like a small bank, yet outside the Reserve Bank’s banking supervision, which is the gap the designation closes.

The PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 (PMLR)

The rules made under the PMLA serve as the day-to-day operational guidelines. The rules mandate procedures for identifying members and beneficial owners (Rule 9). Establish reporting details and timelines (Rule 3 and Rule 8), and the appointment of a Principal Officer and Designated Director (Rule 7). Additionally, Rule 7(3) obligates societies to maintain internal mechanisms for detecting suspicious transactions.

To keep pace with regulatory needs, the PMLR has evolved through 31 Gazette notifications and orders, set out below in chronological order.

The 31 PMLR Amendment Notifications, in Date Order:

Gazette notification and date Key change or rule touched 
G.S.R. 389(E), 24 May 2007 The first amendment to the 2005 Rules. It stretched the Rule 2 definition of a suspicious transaction to cover dealings without economic rationale or bona fide purpose and those indicating terrorism financing, reframed Rule 3 around cash dealings in forged or counterfeit currency, replaced Rule 8 on how information is furnished to the Director, and reduced the Rule 9 requirement from three certified copies to one. 
G.S.R. 816(E), 12 November 2009 Amendment that inserted the non-profit organisation and Regulator definitions, reframed the suspicious transaction, and required the reporting of NPO receipts over Rupees 10 lakh. It set ten-year record retention under Rule 6 and reworked Rule 9 to require beneficial owner identification, ongoing due diligence, a bar on anonymous accounts and a Client Identification Programme. 
G.S.R. 76(E), 12 February 2010 Adjusted Rules 3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 to strengthen record-keeping and the reporting requirements. It also introduced the first explanation in Rule 9(1A), clarifying that a beneficial owner is the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a client, or on behalf a transaction is conducted.  
G.S.R. 508(E), 16 June 2010 Recast Rules 2, 9 and 10, the provisions on definitions, customer due diligence and record-keeping, revising how a reporting entity identifies its members and what it must keep, within the steady 2010 tightening of the CDD and records regime. 
G.S.R. 980(E), 16 December 2010 Brought in the small-account regime: it defined the Designated Officer and the small account, expanded the officially valid documents in Rule 2 to take in the NREGA job card and the Aadhaar letter, and added Rule 9(2A) governing the opening and monitoring of such an account. 
G.S.R. 481(E), 24 June 2011 Created the short title, amending Rule 1 to abbreviate the long 2005 name to the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, the PMLR shorthand relied on ever since. 
G.S.R. 576(E), 27 August 2013 Amended Rules 2 and 3 and added provisions after Rule 10, dealing with definitions, the cash and suspicious transaction reporting duties and the record framework so they aligned with the reporting obligations. 
G.S.R. 288(E), 15 April 2015 Adjusted the Rule 2 definitions; since definitions decide who and what the operative rules reach, the change carried across the framework and started a series of 2015 updates. 
G.S.R. 544(E), 7 July 2015 Adjusted Rules 2, 9 and 10 it strengthened the framework for customer identification, verification and maintenance of records as part of a broader overhaul of the regime.  
G.S.R. 730(E), 22 September 2015 Revised Rules 2 and 7, the definitions and the requirement for a Principal Officer and an internal reporting mechanism, reinforcing the governance side and the reporting function. 
G.S.R. 882(E), 18 November 2015 Amended the definitions and reporting provisions, revising how key terms are read and how transactions reach the FIU, and closing the 2015 series of amendments. 
G.S.R. 347(E), 12 April 2017 Revised Rule 2 and inserted Rule 9A, drawing the Central KYC Records Registry into the Rules, creating the duty to file member KYC records centrally and the basis to reuse them, the structural addition behind today’s CKYCR. 
G.S.R. 538(E), 1 June 2017 Amended Rules 2 and 9 to incorporate Aadhaar into customer due diligence, prescribing Aadhaar-based identification and authentication for KYC, an approach later reshaped by the Supreme Court’s Aadhaar ruling. 
G.S.R. 1038(E), 21 August 2017 Updated the operative terms that underpin the application of the PMLA under Rule 2.  
G.S.R. 1318(E), 23 October 2017 Inserted a proviso under Rule 2 regarding the relevancy of proof of address issued by the government authority. 
G.S.R. 456(E), 16 May 2018 Substituted clauses under Rule 9 and provided what shall the sector specific guidelines include.  
G.S.R. 1078(E), 31 October 2018 Amended the timeline for filing of electronic records of client’s CDD to national registry within 10 days instead of 3 under Rule 9. 
G.S.R. 108(E), 13 February 2019 Revised Rules 2 and 9 on definitions and customer due diligence, after the legislative changes to Aadhaar use, revising the ways identification could be conducted. 
G.S.R. 381(E), 28 May 2019 Further amended Rule 9, revising the identification and verification process and the routes to confirm a member’s identity, part of the post-Aadhaar reshaping of CDD. 
G.S.R. 582(E), 19 August 2019 Revised Rules 2 and 9 and inserted an annexure after Rule 11, updated definitions and strengthened customer due diligence and the reporting requirements.  
G.S.R. 669(E), 18 September 2019 Amended Rules 2 and 9 again, revising the definitions and the customer due diligence process within the 2019 series of CDD amendments. 
G.S.R. 840(E), 13 November 2019 Revised identification and verification requirements under Rule 9. 
G.S.R. 228(E), 31 March 2020 Amended the operational timeline of the small accounts for the covid period and further as notified by the government. 
G.S.R. 251(E), 13 April 2020 Revised the manner and content of what a reporting entity submits under Rule 8. 
G.S.R. 254(E), 16 April 2020 A further Rule 8 change days after the previous one, it substituted the timeline for the furnishing of transactions reports.  
G.S.R. 798(E), 28 December 2020 The notification widened the regulatory framework by designating Real estate and DPMS sector as a DNFBP and naming CBIC as their sectoral supervisor.  
G.S.R. 575(E), 13 July 2022 Inserted the International Financial Services Centre definition with a supporting beneficial owner provision for entities based at IFSC and added an IFSC proviso to Rule 9A on the CKYCR, aligning the Rules with the GIFT City regime. 
S.O. 1074(E), 7 March 2023 A major change that inserted definitions of politically exposed persons, non-profit organisations and group and a Rule 3A duty for group-wide AML policies and cut the company beneficial ownership threshold from 25 to 10 per cent, with a matching change to Rule 9(3)(e). 
G.S.R. 652(E), 4 September 2023 The second major 2023 amendment that required the Principal Officer to be at management level, decreased the partnership beneficial ownership threshold from 15 to 10 per cent, inserted an Explanation of control, made trustees disclose their status, and brought the results of any Rule 3 and Rule 9 analysis into the records a reporting entity keeps. 
G.S.R. 745(E), 17 October 2023 Amended Rules 2, 3, 8 and 9 updating key definitions, the reporting duties and customer due diligence. Together the amendment refined the operational framework. 
G.S.R. 419(E), 19 July 2024 Revised Rule 9(1C) on the KYC Identifier and set a seven-day deadline to update a CKYCR record after any change, added a duty to fetch the updated record, and revised Rule 9A(2)(g) on filing, retrieving and using registry records, keeping central KYC data current. 
The PML (Manner of Receiving the Records Authenticated Outside India) Rules, 2005

A short set of rules on accepting member records authenticated outside India. For a society, they apply where a non-resident member or an overseas body is onboarded, and the identity documents relied on were executed and certified abroad rather than in India, a less common but real situation for larger multi-state societies.

CFT Legislation

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA)

India’s principal counter terrorism Act. Its Section 51A requires a society to screen its members and beneficial owners against the designated terrorism lists and to freeze, without delay, the funds and deposits of any listed person or entity. This screening obligation binds every multi-state cooperative society, whatever its size.

Procedure for implementation of Section 51A of the UAPA (order dated 2 February 2021; corrigendum dated 15 March 2023 and 29 August 2023)

The sanctions screening procedure a society follows to give effect to Section 51A when a member matches a designated list. A society builds the screening and freezing steps into its membership and account procedures, so the statutory order becomes a concrete workflow.

CPF Legislation

The Weapons of Mass Destruction and their Delivery Systems (Prohibition of Unlawful Activities) Act, 2005 (WMD Act)

India’s counter-proliferation financing statute. Section 12A supplies the legal basis for targeted financial sanctions aimed at the financing of weapons of mass destruction, and it reaches a society because deposit and credit facilities can be used to hold and move value for a sanctioned network.

Procedure for implementation of Section 12A of the WMD Act (dated 1 September 2023)

The implementation procedure for Section 12A, which mirrors the Section 51A screening and freezing steps but for proliferation financing designated entities and individuals, is applied by a society alongside its terrorism list screening.

The WMD and their Delivery Systems (Prohibition of Unlawful Activities) Implementation Rules, 2016

The subordinate rules that put the WMD Act into operation and support the designated list handling, freezing and reporting actions a society must be able to carry out the moment a proliferation financing designation match arises.

Not registered with FIU-IND yet, or unsure whether you have to be?

AML India can confirm whether your firm qualifies as a reporting entity under the PMLA, complete your goAML registration and appoint your principal officer and designated director.

Overarching Obligations

The national obligations that a society complies with as a reporting entity.

CERSAI Central KYC Records Registry (CKYCR) Operating Guidelines, 2025

The operating guidelines for the national registry of KYC, enabling societies to upload, retrieve and reuse a member’s verified KYC record across reporting entities, reducing duplication and promoting consistent customer due diligence. Their effectiveness depends on collecting accurate member identity and beneficial ownership information at onboarding.

FINnet 2.0 reporting formats (2024) and the FINGate 2.0 user manuals

The FIU-IND reporting platform, its 2024 reporting formats and the FINGate 2.0 user manuals through which a society enrols and submits the prescribed reports. The Central Registrar has specifically directed multi-state cooperative societies to register themselves on the FINnet portal, the first practical step in compliance.

Section 11A Aadhaar Authentication Procedure for Non-Banking Entities (9 May 2019)

The procedure through which non-banking reporting entities apply for authorisation to use Aadhaar authentication for KYC. It is relevant to MSCSs because, although many provide deposit and credit services similar to banks, they are non-banking reporting entities under the PMLA and must obtain the mentioned approval before verifying a member’s identity through Aadhaar.

Sectoral Guidelines

The supervisor and its society-specific instruments. This is the layer that gives the cooperative regime its own character, because supervision runs through the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies while FIU-IND issues the AML guidelines and receives the reports.

Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Ministry of Cooperation)

AML/CFT Guidelines for Multi-State Cooperative Societies (effective 11 October 2024)

The primary Aml/CFT guidance for MSCSs and the most important instrument for the sector. Effective from 11 October 2024, the Guidelines prescribe the operational requirements for implementing the PMLA, including policies and procedures, customer due diligence, officially valid documents for members, beneficial owner identification, transaction monitoring, suspicious transaction reporting, record-keeping, the appointment of a Designated Director and a Principal Officer, and compliance with Sections 51A and 12A of the UAPA and the WMD Act respectively. While the PMLA establishes the legal obligations, these guidelines provide the practical framework for meeting them.

Central Registrar circular directing registration and compliance

The circular issued through the Office of the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Ministry of Cooperation, directing every multi-state cooperative society to comply with the FIU-IND AML/CFT guidelines and to register itself on the FINnet portal. It is the instrument that puts the supervisor’s authority behind the guidelines for the sector.

Notification designating multi-state cooperative societies as DNFBPs, G.S.R. 424(E) (4 May 2018)

The instrument that brings every society registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 within section 2(1)(sa) of the PMLA. As the earliest of the DNFBP designations, it made cooperative societies the first non-financial businesses drawn into the reporting entity regime.

Miscellaneous Official Reports and Guidance

Official reports and guidance that sit outside the binding rulebook but shape how a society reads its risk and its duties.

FIU-IND Annual Report 2024-25

The national FIU’s annual report provides an overview of the financial intelligence unit’s reporting, analysis and enforcement activities. It offers valuable insights into emerging AML/CFT trends, reporting patterns, supervisory priorities and regulatory expectations for reporting entities, including multi-state cooperative societies.

Directorate of Enforcement Annual Report 2025-26

The Enforcement Directorate’s annual report summarises the agency’s investigations, provisional attachments and prosecutions under the PMLA during the preceding year. It provides insight into the enforcement of India’s AML framework, including typologies and cases involving societies and the misuse of member deposits.

FIU-IND and its Core Functions and FAQs

A practical overview of FIU-IND’s role, functions and reporting framework. It serves as a useful introductory resource for MSCSs establishing their AML reporting function, explaining how to register on FINnet 2.0 for the first time.

MHA National Counter Terrorism Policy and Strategy

The Ministry of Home Affairs statement of national counter terrorism policy and strategy, it outlines India’s approach to combating terrorism and terrorist financing. It provides the policy context for the targeted financial sanctions and counter terrorism obligations that MSCSs must implement under Section 51A of the PMLA framework.

International Standards

The global benchmarks India is measured against, and the sources a society can use to calibrate a risk-based approach to its membership and deposits.

FATF Recommendations

The recommendations establish international AML, CFT and CPF standards on which India’s regulatory framework is based and against which it is assessed. As multi-state cooperative societies are designated as DNFBPs through notification G.S.R. 424 (E) dated 4 May 2018, they are subject to the customer due diligence and suspicions transaction reporting standards reflected in Recommendations 22 and 23. The recommendations were last updated in June 2026, with one of the key changes relating to Recommendation 6 on targeted financial sanctions, reinforcing sanctions screening and asset freezing obligations.

FATF Mutual Evaluation Report on India, 2024 (and Executive Summary)

The 2024 FATF peer review of India’s legal framework, with a separate executive summary. It examined how supervision and reporting work in practice, including DNFBPs and the cooperative sector, with its deposit-taking risk, which is among the areas where the review signals room to strengthen supervision.

Allied Laws

The supporting body of law that defines both the cooperative framework, offences and enforcement machinery around money laundering. A society operates under the cooperative statutes, while the enforcement Acts shape the risk it must assess and the conduct it may need to report.

The wider body of framework that most bear on the sector are following:

The Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, the Multi-State Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2023 and the Multi-State Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Rules, 2023, with the several State Cooperative Societies Acts: together establish the legal framework for the registration, governance, management, financial administration and regulatory oversight of cooperative societies in India. Complementing these are the principal offence and enforcement laws that shape a society’s money laundering and financial crime risk. These include the Companies Act, 2013, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, The Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), The Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976(SAFEMA), the Arms Act, 1959, the Chemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000 and the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003.

Core AML/CFT/CPF Obligations for Multi-State Cooperative Societies in India

As a reporting entity, a multi-state cooperative society must do the following. This article keeps each at the level required by law; a compliance requirements guide explains how to do each. Correspondent banking and wire-transfer duties are not included here because they do not apply to a cooperative society designated as a DNFBP.

  • Register with FIU-IND. Enrol with the Financial Intelligence Unit of India on the FINnet 2.0 / FINGate 2.0 portal, as directed by the Central Registrar’s circular, so the society can file its reports.
  • Appoint officers. Appoint a Designated Director and a management-level Principal Officer under Rule 7 of the PMLR. The same person cannot hold both roles, and both are to be informed to FIU-IND.
  • Conduct the internal risk assessment. Assess money laundering, terror financing and proliferation financing risk across members, products such as deposits and credit, delivery channels and geographies, and keep it current.
  • Document AML policy, controls and procedures. Adopt a board-approved policy that turns the risk assessment into the society’s operating procedures, as required by the FIU-IND Guidelines.
  • Member identification and CDD. Identify and verify every member and the beneficial owner (a controlling interest of more than 10 per cent for a company or partnership, and more than 15 per cent for an unincorporated association or body of individuals), with enhanced due diligence for politically exposed persons and high-risk members, under Section 11A of the PMLA, Rule 9 of the PMLR and the FIU-IND Guidelines.
  • Ongoing monitoring and periodic update. Monitor member accounts and transactions on an ongoing basis, and refresh KYC at least once every 2, 8 and 10 years for high, medium and low-risk members respectively. Review each member’s risk categorisation at least once every six months and decide whether enhanced due diligence is required.
  • Sanctions screening. Screen members and beneficial owners against the designated lists under Section 51A of the UAPA and Section 12A of the WMD Act and freeze and report any match. Verify the relevant UNSC and domestic designated lists daily. This duty applies to every society.
  • Regulatory reporting. File cash transaction reports for cash of more than Rupees 10 lakh and for connected cash transactions crossing that figure in a month, reports on cash transactions involving counterfeit currency, forged valuable security or forged documents, and suspicious transaction reports of any value, including attempted transactions, under Rule 3 and Rule 8 of the PMLR. Cash and counterfeit reports are filed monthly, by the 15th day of the succeeding month; a suspicious transaction report is filed promptly once the Principal Officer is satisfied that the transaction is suspicious, through FINnet 2.0.
  • Record management, CKYCR and FINnet 2.0. Keep transaction records for five years from the date of the transaction and keep identity records and business correspondence for five years after the membership ends, under Section 12 of the PMLA. Upload member KYC records to the Central KYC Records Registry under Rule 9A, and file all prescribed reports through FINnet 2.0.
  • Training and awareness. Train the board, management and staff by role to apply the controls and recognise the red flags of laundering through deposit and credit accounts.
  • Independent testing and audit. Test the programme through internal audit, compliance assurance or independent review, alongside the society’s statutory cooperative audit, and close every finding.

What this article does not cover

This article explains the AML, CFT and CPF laws that apply to multi-state cooperative societies as designated businesses. It does not provide a control-by-control compliance manual; it does not restate the registration, governance and audit requirements of the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, except where they bear on the AML duties. For implementation, a society separately documents member acceptance, KYC and CDD procedures, beneficial owner identification, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring, suspicious transaction reporting, staff training, audit testing and board reporting. Those controls are the subject of the companion compliance guide.

To see how the cooperative framework fits within the national picture, see AML laws and regulations in India, and use the parent overview, AML laws and regulations for DNFBPs in India, to see how cooperative societies sit alongside the other designated businesses. This

From regulation to compliance: your next step

Understanding the law is only the first step. An effective compliance programme can only be reached when these obligations are translated into a robust, risk-based compliance programme. These include FIU-IND registration, risk assessment, policy and procedure, customer due diligence, monitoring, screening, reporting, training and independent audit. Because a society handles members’ money like a bank, member identification and transaction monitoring are the controls that matter most. Knowing the three stages of money laundering and how the sanctions screening process works is a useful starting point.

Setting up AML compliance for your society?

AML India can help you register with FIU-IND on FINnet and build a proportionate programme aligned to the 2024 cooperative guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, every society registered under the Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 is designated as a person carrying on a designated business or profession under section 2(1)(sa) of the PMLA by G.S.R. 424(E) of 4 May 2018. 

The Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies, in the Ministry of Cooperation, supervises the sector and has directed societies by circular to comply with the FIU-IND AML/CFT guidelines and to register on the FINnet portal. FIU-IND issues the AML guidelines and receives the reports, and the Enforcement Directorate investigates and prosecutes the offence of money laundering.

No. An MSCS becomes subject to the PMLA by virtue of its registration under the Multi-State Cooperative Society Act, not based on any turnover, transaction value or the volume of business.

The AML/CFT Guidelines for multi-state cooperative societies took effect from 11 October 2024. They set out the customer due diligence, beneficial owner identification, ongoing monitoring, suspicious transaction reporting, record-keeping and sanctions obligations a society must follow, and are applied under the Central Registrar’s circular.

Cash transaction reports for cash of more than Rupees 10 lakh and for linked cash transactions crossing the threshold, reports on counterfeit or forged instruments, and suspicious transaction reports of any value, including attempted transactions. Cash and counterfeit reports are filed monthly, by the 15th of the succeeding month; suspicious transaction reports are filed promptly, through FINnet 2.0.

A cooperative bank is regulated by the Reserve Bank of India under the banking framework and is supervised for AML compliance under the RBI’s KYC directions and the PMLA as a Banking company. In contrast, A multi-state cooperative society is designated as a reporting entity under the PMLA through G.S.R. 424 (E) dated 4 May 2018 and is supervised for AML by the Central Registrar and FIU-IND as a designated business. While the PMLA duties are similar, the supervisor and the sector guidelines differ.

Yes. The screening duties under Section 51A of the UAPA and Section 12A of the WMD Act apply to every multi-state cooperative society. A society screens its members and beneficial owners against the United Nations and domestic designated lists and freezes and reports any match, whatever the size of the account.

Official sources and review

Why work with AML India

AML India helps multi-state cooperative societies comply with their obligations under the PMLA and Central Registrar framework by providing end-to-end compliance support. Our services cover FIU-IND registration, risk assessment, customer due diligence, screening, ongoing monitoring, reporting, training and independent audit.

Industries we serve: Multi-State Cooperative Societies, Banks and Financial Institutions, Real Estate Agents, Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones, Trust and Company Service Providers, Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries and Cost and Management Accountants, Virtual Asset Service Providers, Casinos and the Gaming Sector, and IFSC and GIFT City entities.

About the Author

Pathik Shah

FCA, CAMS, CISA, CS, DISA (ICAI), FAFP (ICAI)

Pathik is a Chartered Accountant with more than 26 years of experience in governance, risk, and compliance. He helps companies with end-to-end AML compliance services, from conducting Enterprise- Wide Risk Assessments to implementing the robust AML Compliance framework. He has played a pivotal role as a functional expert in developing and implementing RegTech solutions for streamlined compliance.

 

Reach Out to Pathik