Last Updated  on: 22nd July 2026       |        Last Reviewed on: 22nd July 2026

Key takeaways briefly

  • Who is covered: Dealers in Precious Metals and Precious Stones, including jewellers, bullion dealers and gems traders, notified as a designated business under section 2(1)(sa) of the PMLA.
  • The trigger: a cash transaction with a customer of Rupees 10 lakh or above, in a single operation or in several linked operations, under G.S.R. 799(E) of 28 December 2020.
  • Governing laws: the PMLA, 2002 and the PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005; the Directorate General of Audit AML/CFT/CPF Guidelines for DPMS, 2023; the UAPA 1967 (Section 51A) and the WMD Act, 2005 (Section 12A).
  • Regulator: the Directorate General of Audit (DG Audit) on behalf of Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) Reports go to the Financial Intelligence Unit  India (FIU-IND); the Enforcement Directorate (ED) enforces the PMLA.
  • Core duties: registration with FIU-IND, an internal risk assessment, customer due diligence and KYC, beneficial owner identification, ongoing monitoring, cash and suspicious transaction reporting, five-year record keeping and sanctions screening.

Dealers in precious metals and precious stones (DPMS) are reporting entities under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. A jeweller, bullion dealer or gems trader is covered once it engages in a cash transaction with a customer of Rupees 10 lakh or above, in a single operation or in several linked operations. From that point, its AML, CFT and CPF duties flow from the PMLA, the PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005, the AML/CFT/CPF Guidelines for DPMS issued by the Directorate General of Audit, Section 51A of the UAPA, Section 12A of the WMD Act, and the FIU-IND reporting framework. The Directorate General of Audit is the regulator on behalf of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs; mandatory reports are filed with FIU-IND, and investigations are conducted by the Enforcement Directorate.

The core instruments at a glance

Instrument What it does for a dealer
PMLA, 2002 The principal Act. Makes a dealer a reporting entity and creates the core duties of CDD, record keeping and reporting.
PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 Set out what to report and when, how to identify customers and beneficial owners, and the duty to appoint officers.
G.S.R. 799(E), 28 December 2020 The notification that designates dealers in precious metals and stones and sets as DNFBPs and the Rupees 10 lakh cash as the threshold.
AML/CFT/CPF Guidelines for DPMS, 2023 (DG Audit) The dealer’s working rulebook, issued by the regulator, effective 29 November 2023.
UAPA Section 51A and WMD Act Section 12A Impose targeted financial sanctions for terrorism and proliferation financing, applied by every dealer regardless of turnover.
FATF Recommendations 22 and 23 The international standards for DNFBPs that India’s DNFBP regime is built to meet.

What counts as a dealer in precious metals and stones in India?

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 defines the relevant terms. Under section 2(1)(ib), a dealer has the meaning assigned in the Central Sales Tax Act, namely a person who carries on the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods. Under 2(1)(sb), precious metal means gold, silver, platinum, palladium or rhodium, or any other metal notified by the Central Government. And under section 2(1)(sc), precious stones means a diamond, emerald, ruby, sapphire, or any other stone so notified.

In everyday terms, this includes jewellers, bullion dealers, gems and diamond traders and similar businesses. However, a dealer becomes subject to reporting entity obligations under the PMLA only when it undertakes a cash transaction of Rupees 10 lakh or above with a customer, whether in a single transaction or across several scattered transactions that appear to be linked. Dealers that do not cross the cash transaction threshold are not subject to the PMLA reporting requirements, but they must still comply with the sanctions screening obligations, which bind every dealer irrespective of turnover or transaction size.

Are dealers in precious metals and stones reporting entities under the PMLA?

Yes, under section 2(1)(wa) of the PMLA, a dealer becomes a reporting entity because it carries on a designated business or profession under section 2(1)(sa). Dealers in precious metals, precious stones and other high-value goods were brought within the scope of the PMLA through notification by G.S.R. 799(E) of 28 December 2020, which designates them as reporting entities when they engage in a cash transaction of Rupees 10 lakh or above with a customer, in a single transaction or in several linked transactions.

Once this threshold is met, the dealer must register with the Director, FIU-IND at the first instance of such a cash transaction and then run a full AML working programme. This places a dealer in the same broad category of reporting entities that file with FIU-IND as banks, financial institutions, and other professionals scaled to the size and risk of the business. It also connects the dealer to the wider list of DNFBPs subject to the PMLA.

Supervisory authority for dealers in precious metals and stones in India

The regulator for dealers in precious metals and stones is the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, named in Rule 2(1)(fa) of the PMLR. The CBIC acts through its Directorate General of Audit, which was appointed as the Regulator on behalf of the CBIC by an office memorandum of the Commissioner (GST-Investigation) dated 22 November 2021. The Additional Director General, DG Audit, has also been appointed as the Nodal Officer for the purposes of Section 51A of the UAPA and Section 12A of the WMD Act.

DG Audit issues the guidelines dealers refer to and may take action where a dealer falls short of its compliance obligations. The Financial Intelligence Unit – India receives, analyses, and disseminates the reports dealers file, and the Enforcement Directorate investigates and prosecutes the offence of money laundering under the PMLA. In short, DG Audit sets and supervises the rules for dealers, FIU-IND receives the intelligence, and the ED enforces the criminal law.

Onboarding clients without a documented due-diligence process?

AML India can put client due diligence, beneficial-ownership checks and suspicious-transaction reporting in place for your practice, keeping you audit-ready without slowing your engagements down.

AML Regulatory Requirements for Dealers in Precious Metals and Stones in India

The law that governs a dealer does not sit in one place. It is a categorised catalogue between the core legislation, the overarching obligations, the sectoral regulator and its guidelines, the miscellaneous official reports, the international standards, and the allied laws. Each category below lists the instruments that apply, with a short note on what each does for a dealer.

The framework reads from the core outward. The PMLA is the parent Act; the PML Rules turn it into operational duties; the designation notification brings the dealer in; the DG Audit Guidelines translate the duties into instructions a jeweller or bullion dealer can follow; the UAPA and the WMD Act add counter terrorism and proliferation financing sanctions; and the allied laws shape the predicate offence risk. The risk-based approach is the thread that runs through it all.

Core Legislation

The primary statutes and rules that create the AML, CFT and CPF obligations, grouped into three groups.

AML Legislation

Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

India’s parent anti-money laundering statute and the source of a dealer’s reporting entity status. It defines the offence of money laundering and imposes the reporting entity duties, customer due diligence under Section 11A and record-keeping under Section 12, that a jeweller, bullion dealer or gems trader must build in once it crosses the cash threshold. High-value, portable and easily resold stock is what makes a precious metals business attractive for laundering, which is why the Act reaches it at all.

The PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 (PMLR)

The operational rulebook made under the PMLA, and the layer a dealer works from. It fixes what to report and when (Rule 3 and Rule 8), how to identify customers and beneficial owners (Rule 9), the duty to appoint a Principal Officer and Designated Director (Rule 7) and, in Rule 7(3), the very power under which FIU-IND issued the dealer red-flag indicators. The PMLR has been amended through 31 Gazette notifications and orders. Read the table below as a legal history advancement.

The 31 PMLR amendment notifications, in date order:
Gazette notification and date Key change or rule touched
G.S.R. 389(E), 24 May 2007 The first change to the 2005 Rules. It broadened the Rule 2 meaning of a suspicious transaction to take in dealings with no apparent economic rationale or bona fide purpose and those hinting at terrorism financing, revised Rule 3 to catch cash dealings in forged or counterfeit currency, substituted Rule 8 on how information reaches the Director, and relaxed Rule 9 from three certified copies to one.
G.S.R. 816(E), 12 November 2009 It added the definitions of non-profit organisation and Regulator, amended the suspicious transaction meaning, and mandated reporting of NPO receipts above Rupees 10 lakh. It fixed record retention at ten years under Rule 6 and revised Rule 9 around beneficial owner identification, ongoing due diligence, and introduced ban on anonymous accounts and a Client Identification Programme.
G.S.R. 76(E), 12 February 2010 Revised Rules 3, 4, 5 and 7 to tidy record keeping and the reporting cross references, and, most importantly, added the first Explanation in Rule 9(1A) defining the beneficial owner as the natural person who ultimately owns or controls a client or for whom a transaction is carried out.
G.S.R. 508(E), 16 June 2010 Amended Rules 2, 9 and 10, the definitions, customer due diligence and record keeping provisions, adjusting how a reporting entity identifies customers and what it must keep.
G.S.R. 980(E), 16 December 2010 Inserted the small-account regime. It defined the Designated Officer and the small account, expanded the officially valid documents in Rule 2 to include the NREGA job card and the Aadhaar letter, and added Rule 9(2A) on how such an account is opened and monitored.
G.S.R. 481(E), 24 June 2011 It amended Rule 1 to shorten the long 2005 name to the Prevention of Money Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, the PMLR label that has been used ever since.
G.S.R. 576(E), 27 August 2013 Revised Rules 2 and 3 and added provisions after Rule 10, adjusting the definitions, the cash and suspicious transaction reporting duties and the record framework so they sat more closely with the reporting obligations.
G.S.R. 288(E), 15 April 2015 Revised Rule 2 definitions. Because definitions decide who and what the operative rules reach, the change rippled through the framework, and it opened a run of 2015 updates.
G.S.R. 544(E), 7 July 2015 Amended Rules 2, 9 and 10 on definitions, customer due diligence and record-keeping, refining how a reporting entity identifies customers and what evidence it retains.
G.S.R. 730(E), 22 September 2015 Amended Rules 2 and 7, the definitions and the requirement for a Principal Officer and an internal reporting mechanism, sharpening the governance side of the framework and who runs the reporting function.
G.S.R. 882(E), 18 November 2015 Substituted the definitions and reporting provisions, changing how key terms are read and how transactions reach the FIU, and closing the cluster of 2015 amendments.
G.S.R. 347(E), 12 April 2017 Revised Rule 2 and inserted Rule 9A, which folded the Central KYC Records Registry into the Rules, creating the duty to file customer KYC records centrally and the basis to reuse them, the structural change behind today’s CKYCR.
G.S.R. 538(E), 1 June 2017 Amended Rules 2 and 9 to weave Aadhaar into customer due diligence, setting out Aadhaar based identification and authentication in KYC, an approach later reshaped by the Supreme Court’s Aadhaar judgment.
G.S.R. 1038(E), 21 August 2017 Further revised Rule 2 definitions, adjusting the defined terms that govern how the operative rules apply.
G.S.R. 1318(E), 23 October 2017 A later 2017 revision of the Rule 2 definitions, keeping the defined terms current as the framework moved on.
G.S.R. 456(E), 16 May 2018 Added clauses under Rule 9 requiring the authorities to publish guidelines including exemptions, limitations and all the other mentioned specifications.
G.S.R. 1078(E), 31 October 2018 Revised Rule 9 on customer due diligence records to be updated on the central KYC registry records timeframe from 3 days to 10 days.
G.S.R. 108(E), 13 February 2019 Amended Rules 2 and 9 on definitions, following the legislative changes to Aadhaar use and adjusting how client identification may be carried out.
G.S.R. 381(E), 28 May 2019 Amended Rule 9, refining the identification and verification process and the ways for confirming a customer’s identity, part of the post-Aadhaar adaptation of CDD.
G.S.R. 582(E), 19 August 2019 Amended Rules 2 and 9 and added provisions after Rule 11, customer due diligence and the supporting provisions on information and records, one of the wider 2019 updates.
G.S.R. 669(E), 18 September 2019 Revised Rules 2 and 9, polishing the definitions and the customer due diligence process within the 2019 cluster of CDD amendments.
G.S.R. 840(E), 13 November 2019 Amended Rule 9 with further improving to the identification and verification requirements, closing the 2019 run of CDD changes.
G.S.R. 228(E), 31 March 2020 Revised the definitions and reporting provisions, adjusting defined terms and how transactions are reported, the first of three closely spaced 2020 amendments.
G.S.R. 251(E), 13 April 2020 Amended Rule 8 on the furnishing of transaction reports to the FIU, refining how and what a reporting entity reports.
G.S.R. 254(E), 16 April 2020 A second amendment to Rule 8 within days of the last, together tightening the reporting provisions and how reports reach the FIU.
G.S.R. 798(E), 28 December 2020 The pivotal notification for dealers. Read with G.S.R. 799(E) of the same day, it designated real estate agents and dealers in precious metals and stones as persons carrying on designated business or profession and named the CBIC as regulator, extending the regime well beyond banks to reach jewellers and bullion dealers.
G.S.R. 575(E), 13 July 2022 Added the International Financial Services Centre definition and a tailored beneficial owner rule for entities at Gift City, plus an IFSC proviso to Rule 9A on the CKYCR, aligning the Rules with the GIFT City framework.
S.O. 1074(E), 7 March 2023 A major change. It added and substituted definitions of politically exposed persons, non-profit organisations and group and a Rule 3A duty for group-wide AML policies, and, most consequentially for a dealer, cut the company beneficial ownership threshold from 25 to 10 per cent, with a matching change to Rule 9(3)(e).
G.S.R. 652(E), 4 September 2023 It obligated the Principal Officer to be at management level, cut the partnership beneficial ownership threshold from 15 to 10 per cent, added an Explanation of control, made trustees disclose their status, and added the results of any Rule 3 and Rule 9 analysis to the records a reporting entity keeps.
G.S.R. 745(E), 17 October 2023 Amended Rules 2, 3, 8 and 9 covering definitions, the reporting duties and customer due diligence, refining several operative provisions at once concluding the 2023 changes.
G.S.R. 419(E), 19 July 2024 Amended Rule 9(1C) on the KYC Identifier and required CKYCR records to be updated within seven days of any change, added the duty to retrieve updated records and amended Rule 9A(2)(g) on filing, retrieving and using registry records, sharpening how current central KYC data is kept.
The PML (Manner of Receiving the Records Authenticated Outside India) Rules, 2005

A short set of rules governing customer records authenticated outside India. For a dealer, they provide regulatory obligations for a sale to a non-resident buyer, an overseas company or a foreign trust, where the identity and ownership documents relied on were executed, notarised and certified abroad rather than in India.

CFT Legislation

The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA)

India’s principal counter terrorism statute. Its Section 51A obliges a dealer to screen customers and beneficial owners against the designated terrorism lists and to freeze, without delay, the funds, financial assets and economic resources of any listed person or entity. Unlike the reporting duties, this screening obligation binds every dealer in precious metals and stones, whatever its turnover or the size of the sale.

Procedure for implementation of Section 51A of the UAPA (order dated 2 February 2021; corrigendum dated 15 March 2023)

The step-by-step procedure a dealer follows to give effect to Section 51A when a customer or beneficial owner matches a designated list. DG Audit has translated it into a dealer-specific standard operating procedure dated 4 December 2023, so a jeweller works from a concrete screen, hold and report workflow rather than only the bare statutory order.

CPF Legislation

The Weapons of Mass Destruction and their Delivery Systems (Prohibition of Unlawful Activities) Act, 2005 (WMD Act)

India’s key legislation for counter-proliferation financing. Section 12A supplies the legal basis for targeted financial sanctions aimed at the financing of weapons of mass destruction, and it reaches a dealer in precious metals and stones just as it reaches a bank, because compact, high-value assets such as gold and diamonds are an attractive channel for sanctioned procurement networks.

Procedure for implementation of Section 12A of the WMD Act (dated 1 September 2023)

The implementation procedure for Section 12A, it mirrors the Section 51A screening and freezing steps but for proliferation financing designations. For a dealer, it runs through the same DG Audit sanctions screening SOP, so the terrorism and proliferation lists are both checked within a single, combined workflow at the point of sale.

The WMD and their Delivery Systems (Prohibition of Unlawful Activities) Implementation Rules, 2016

The subordinate rules made under the WMD Act operationalise the targeted financial sanctions. It supports the designated list, freezing and reporting measures; a dealer must carry out the moment a proliferation financing designation match arises during a transaction.

Not registered with FIU-IND yet, or unsure whether you have to be?

AML India can confirm whether your firm qualifies as a reporting entity under the PMLA, complete your goAML registration and appoint your principal officer and designated director.

Overarching Obligations

The shared national framework that a dealer must comply with once it becomes a reporting entity.

CERSAI Central KYC Records Registry (CKYCR) Operating Guidelines, 2025

The guideline explains the functioning of the Central KYC Registry Records, which enables reporting entities to upload, retrieve and reuse the verified KYC record, reducing duplication for repeat and cross-firm buyers. For dealers, getting beneficial ownership and identity data right at onboarding is exactly what makes a jeweller’s record reusable and keeps KYC consistent across the system.

FINnet 2.0 reporting formats (2024) and the FINGate 2.0 reports manual (June 2023)

The FIU-IND reporting platform, its reporting formats and the FINGate 2.0 user manuals explain how a dealer enrols and files prescribed reports electronically. For dealers and associates, a dedicated annex of 19 July 2023 provides a step-by-step guide to registering on the portal as a reporting entity; the first practical step can be fulfilled even before undertaking any reportable cash transaction.

Section 11A Aadhar authentication procedure for non-banking entities

The procedure by which an entity other than a banking company applies for permission to use Aadhaar authentication services for KYC. It matters directly to dealers because they are precisely the non-banking reporting entities that must obtain that approval before verifying a customer’s identity through Aadhaar rather than another officially valid document.

Sectoral Guidelines

The regulator and its dealer-specific instruments. This is the layer that gives the DPMS regime its own character.

AML/CFT/CPF Guidelines for Dealers in Precious Metals and Precious Stones, 2023 (effective 29 November 2023)

The dealer’s primary operational guidelines. Issued by DG Audit under the PMLA, UAPA and WMD Act, it explains the obligation to establish policies and procedures, customer due diligence and officially valid documents, cash and suspicious transaction reporting, record keeping, staff training, and the implementation of Sections 51A and 12A of UAPA and WMD Act respectively.

Guidance for detecting suspicious transactions under Rule 7(3) of the PMLR (3 July 2023)

Issued by the Director, FIU-IND under Rule 7(3) of the PMLR, this guidance prescribes Red Flag Indicators for dealers as common minimum alerts, to be supplemented with the dealer’s own business activity. Where alerts are analysed, and a transaction is found suspicious, a suspicious transaction report is filed, with strict care not to tip off the customer.

SOP for screening under Section 51A of the UAPA and Section 12A of the WMD Act by DPMS (4 December 2023)

A dealer-specific standard operating procedure from DG Audit for screening customers and beneficial owners against the United Nations and Government of India sanction lists, identify potential matches, and take the required follow-up action. It puts the sanctions duty into concrete steps for jewellers and bullion dealers.

Notification designating dealers in precious metals and stones as DNFBPs, G.S.R. 799(E) (28 December 2020)

The notification that brings dealers within the scope of section 2(1)(sa) of the PMLA when they undertake a cash transaction of Rupees 10 lakh or more, in a single transaction or multiple linked ones. Read together with G.S.R. 800(E) of the same date, it designates the CBIC as the regulator under Rule 2(1)(fa).

FINGate 2.0 registration annex for dealers (19 July 2023)

The user manual annex provides a step-by-step sign-up process for dealers in precious metals and stones on the FINGate 2.0 portal as a reporting entity. Although registration becomes mandatory once the transaction threshold of rupees 10 lakh is met or crossed, dealers may also proactively enrol to ensure they are prepared to meet their PMLA obligations.  

Miscellaneous official Reports and Guidance

Official reports and guidance that sit outside the binding rulebook but shape how a dealer reads its risk and its duties.

FIU-IND Annual Report 2024-25

The FIU-IND’s annual report provides an overview of the reports it received, analysed and disseminated during the year. For a dealer, it offers valuable insight into reporting trends across the DNFBP sector, FIU-IND’s supervisory and analytical focus areas, and emerging money laundering risks, enabling dealers to benchmark their own reporting practice against the wider sector.

Directorate of Enforcement Annual Report 2025-26

It provides an overview of investigations, provisional attachments, adjudication and prosecutions under the PMLA. For dealers, it offers practical insight on how PMLA is enforced, including cases where high-value goods and jewellery have been attached as proceeds of crime, helping dealers understand AML risks within the sector.

FIU-IND and its Core Functions and FAQs

A question-and-answer explanation of what FIU-IND does and how reporting works. It is a practical primer for a dealer that has just crossed the cash threshold and is standing up its reporting function, appointing officers and enrolling on FINnet 2.0 for the first time.

MHA National Counter-Terrorism Policy and Strategy

The Ministry of Home Affairs statement of national counterterrorism policy and strategy. It frames the wider intent behind the CFT duties that Section 51A places on a dealer, and helps a jeweller understand why sanctions screening applies to it regardless of turnover.

International Standards

The global benchmarks India is measured against, and the sources a dealer can use to calibrate a risk-based approach.

FATF Recommendations

The global AML, CFT and CPF standards on which India’s legal and regulatory framework is based and against which its framework is assessed. Recommendations 22 and 23 are the ones that pull dealers in precious metals and stones into customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reporting, with a specific cash threshold trigger for the sector. Also, Recommendation 6 is relevant as it establishes targeted financial sanctions. The recommendations were last updated by FATF in June 2026.

FATF Mutual Evaluation Report on India, 2024 and Executive Summary

The 2024 FATF peer review of India’s system, with a separate executive summary. It looked closely at how DNFBP supervision and reporting work in practice, dealers in precious metals and stones among them, and it is the benchmark that signals where the precious metals regime is expected to tighten next.

Allied Laws

The corroborative body of law that defines the predicate offences and the enforcement machinery around money laundering. A dealer does not administer these Acts, but they shape the risk it must assess and the conduct it may need to report, from smuggling and customs offences to corruption and the financing of terrorism.

For dealers in precious metals and stones, AML, CFT and CPF compliance extends beyond the PMLA as the sector is vulnerable to the laundering of proceeds generated from smuggling, customs and foreign-exchange violations, corruption, tax evasion, organised crime and other predicate offences. Understanding the allied laws governing these offences enables dealers to identify higher-risk customers and transactions, conduct effective customer due diligence and meet their obligations under PMLA.

Accordingly the allied laws that most often bear on a dealer’s risk are the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (the successors to the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure), the Companies Act, 2013, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015, the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974, the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976, the Arms Act, 1959, the Chemical Weapons Convention Act, 2000 and the Central Vigilance Commission Act, 2003.

Core AML/CFT/CPF Obligations for Cost and Management Accountants in India

Across the legal framework, the regulations require a dealer to do the following. This article keeps each at the level required by law; a compliance requirements guide explains how to do each.

  • Register with FIU-IND. Enrol with the Financial Intelligence Unit of India on the FINnet 2.0 / FINGate 2.0 portal before undertaking any reportable transaction. Dealers may proactively register even before their first cash transaction of Rupees 10 lakh or above with a customer, as early enrolment ensures that the dealer is fully prepared to meet its reporting obligations as soon as they arise.
  • Appoint officers. Appoint a Designated Director and a management-level Principal Officer under Rule 7 of the PMLR. The same person cannot hold both roles, and both are to be informed to FIU-IND.
  • Conduct the internal risk assessment. Assess money laundering, terror financing and proliferation financing risk across customers, products, transaction types, delivery channels and geographies, and keep it current. It is the bedrock of the risk-based approach, and its outcome guides the programme.
  • Document AML policy, controls and procedures. Adopt an approved policy that turns the risk assessment into the dealer’s operating procedures, as required by the DG Audit Guidelines.
  • Customer identification and CDD. Identify and verify every customer and the beneficial owner (a controlling interest of more than 10 per cent for a company or partnership, and more than 15 per cent for an unincorporated association or body of individuals), with enhanced due diligence for politically exposed persons and high-risk customers, under Section 11A of the PMLA, Rule 9 of the PMLR and the DG Audit Guidelines, using the officially valid documents the Guidelines list.
  • Ongoing monitoring and periodic update. Monitor transactions on an ongoing basis, and refresh KYC at least once every 2, 8 and 10 years for high, medium and low-risk customers respectively. Review each customer’s risk categorisation at least once every six months and decide whether enhanced due diligence is required.
  • Sanctions screening. Screen customers and beneficial owners against the designated lists under Section 51A of the UAPA and Section 12A of the WMD Act and freeze and report any match. Verify the relevant UNSC and domestic designated lists on a daily basis, following the DG Audit screening SOP. This duty applies to every dealer, whatever its turnover.
  • Regulatory reporting. File cash transaction reports for cash of Rupees 10 lakh or above and for connected cash transactions that add up to or more than Rupees 10 lakh, reports on cash transactions involving counterfeit currency, forged valuable security or forged documents, and suspicious transaction reports of any value, including attempted transactions, under Rule 3 and Rule 8 of the PMLR. Cash and counterfeit or forged document reports are filed monthly, by the 15th day of the succeeding month; a suspicious transaction report is filed promptly once the Principal Officer is satisfied that the transaction is suspicious.
  • Record management, CKYCR and FINnet 2.0. Keep transaction records for five years from the date of the transaction and keep identity records and business correspondence for five years after the business relationship ends, under Section 12 of the PMLA. Upload customer KYC records to the Central KYC Records Registry under Rule 9A, reuse an existing record where applicable, and file all prescribed reports through FINnet 2.0.
  • Training and awareness. Train staff by role to apply the controls and recognise red flags, including the development of an internal mechanism for indicators under Rule 7(3).
  • Independent testing and audit. Test the programme through internal audit, compliance assurance or independent review, and close every finding.

What this article does not cover

This article explains the legal and regulatory framework applicable to dealers in precious metals and stones. It is not intended to serve as a step-by-step compliance manual. For practical implementation, a dealer is required to separately document customer acceptance, KYC and CDD procedures, beneficial owner identification, sanctions screening, transaction monitoring, suspicious transaction reporting, staff training, audit testing and management reporting. Those operational controls are addressed separately in the companion compliance guide.

To understand how the framework for dealers in precious metals and stones fits within the wider AML, CFT and CPF regime, refer to  AML laws and regulations in India, and use the parent overview, AML laws and regulations for DNFBPs in India, to comprehend how dealers sit alongside the other designated businesses and professions.

From regulation to compliance: your next step

Understanding the legal framework is only the starting point. Compliance obligations protect a dealer only when they are translated into an effective practical programme comprising risk assessment, internal policy and procedure, customer due diligence, ongoing monitoring, screening, reporting, training and independent audit. A dealer that accepts cash transactions of Rupees 10 lakh or above even occasionally becomes a reporting entity. Accordingly, the prudent approach is to establish the compliance programme before undertaking the first prescribed cash transaction, rather than in response to it. A sound Understanding of the three stages of money laundering and the sanctions screening process provides a strong foundation for implementing these obligations effectively.

Not sure whether the Rupees 10 lakh trigger has been crossed

AML India can confirm whether your firm is a reporting entity, when it must register, and what a proportionate programme looks like for a jewelry or bullion business.

Frequently Asked Questions

At the first instance of a cash transaction with a customer of Rupees 10 lakh or above, whether in a single payment or across several linked payments. At that point, the dealer or jeweller must register with the Director, FIU-IND on the FINnet 2.0 / FINGate 2.0 portal and run a full AML programme. A dealer that expects to make such sales should register before the first one rather than after.

It is per cash transaction with a customer, measured either as a single operation or as several operations that appear to be linked. It is not an annual turnover figure. So, a single cash sale of Rupees 10 lakh or more, or a set of connected cash sales that together cross Rupees 10 lakh, is what triggers the reporting entity duties.

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, acting through its Directorate General of Audit, which was appointed the Regulator in November 2021 and issues the AML/CFT/CPF Guidelines for dealers. Reports are filed with the Financial Intelligence Unit India, and the Enforcement Directorate investigates and prosecutes the offence of money laundering.

Cash transaction reports for cash of Rupees 10 lakh or above and for linked cash transactions, reports on cash transactions involving counterfeit currency, forged valuable security or forged documents, and suspicious transaction reports of any value, including attempted transactions. Cash and counterfeit reports are to be filed monthly, by the 15th of the succeeding month, and suspicious transaction reports are to be filed promptly, through FINnet 2.0.

Yes. The screening duties under Section 51A of the UAPA and Section 12A of the WMD Act apply to every dealer in precious metals and stones, irrespective of turnover or the size of any transaction. Only the reporting entity duties, such as registration and cash and suspicious transaction reporting, arise when the Rupees 10 lakh cash trigger is met or crossed.

Non-compliance with the reporting obligations under Chapter IV and Rule 7(3) of the PMLA and PMLR can attract penalties from FIU-IND. The penalties may run up to Rupees 1 lakh per instance of non-compliance. Beyond the penalty, a failure exposes the dealer to enforcement action and reputational harm, so a working detection and reporting mechanism is essential.

The registration trigger is a cash transaction of Rupees 10 lakh or above, so purely electronic or banking-channel sales do not by themselves cross the cash line. However, once a dealer is a reporting entity, its wider duties, including customer due diligence, monitoring and sanctions screening, apply to its business as a whole, not only to cash sales.

This guide covers money-laundering law and compliance, a sensitive area where the rules change; confirm the current position for your business with a qualified professional before acting.

Official sources and review

Why work with AML India

AML India helps dealers in precious metals and stones meet their PMLA and DG Audit obligations, from registration and risk assessment through to CDD, screening, monitoring, reporting, training and independent review.

Industries we serve: jewellers, bullion dealers and gems traders, real estate agents, trust and company service providers, chartered accountants, company secretaries and cost and management accountants, virtual asset service providers, casinos and the gaming sector, and banks, financial institutions and IFSC and GIFT City entities.

About the Author

Pathik Shah

FCA, CAMS, CISA, CS, DISA (ICAI), FAFP (ICAI)

Pathik is a Chartered Accountant with more than 26 years of experience in governance, risk, and compliance. He helps companies with end-to-end AML compliance services, from conducting Enterprise- Wide Risk Assessments to implementing the robust AML Compliance framework. He has played a pivotal role as a functional expert in developing and implementing RegTech solutions for streamlined compliance.

 

Reach Out to Pathik